Speaking at the Congress rally in Jaipur on Sunday, Rahul Gandhi made a distinction between the words âHinduâ and âHindutvaâ. He said: âMahatma Gandhi was a Hindu, but Nathuram Godse was a Hindutvavadi. (File photo)
The Shiv Sena said on Tuesday it was good that Congress leader Rahul Gandhi spoke of “Hindu rule”. In an editorial by its spokesperson âSaamanaâ, the Shiv Sena referred to Rahul Gandhi’s recent speech in Jaipur, in which he declared that this country âbelongs to the Hindus and not to the Hindoutvawadisâ.
READ ALSO | “Gandhi was a Hindu, Godse a Hindoutvavadi”: Rahul Gandhi stands out at the Jaipur rally
âRahul Gandhi also clarified that Mahatma Gandhi was Hindu and Godse was Hindutvawadi. He said that the Hindu is the truth and the Hindutva is power. But what is important is that he underlined the fact that this country is Hindu, âthe editorial said. âWe must not forget that Mahatma Gandhi was a protector of Hindu culture, it was he who bought religious spiritualism.
Speaking at the Congress rally against inflation in Jaipur On Sunday, Rahul Gandhi made a distinction between the words “Hindu” and “Hindutva”. He said, âI am a Hindu, but I am not a Hindutvavadi. You are all Hindus. Mahatma Gandhi was a Hindu but Nathuram Godse was a Hindutvavadi.
WATCH | Rahul Gandhi attacks BJP, distinguishes between ‘Hindu’ and ‘Hindutva’ at rally in Jaipur
The editorial added that Congress, for many years, remained entangled in secularism. “But it seems that Rahul Gandhi is trying to show Congress a new path,” we read.
He also mentioned that NCP leader Sharad Pawar searched Congress, claiming that the party had become the âZameendars of an old Haveli,â a haveli built on a Muslim and Dalit vote bank.
READ ALSO | “India, a country of Hindus”: from Manmohan to Rahul, how the Congress changes its position
âNow in the UP, Bihar, Andhra Pradesh and West Bengal, we can see that this vote bank has escaped Congress. Muslims in Mumbai and Maharashtra have started voting for Shiv Sena. This prompted Congress to rethink its strategy. Secularism does not mean pushing back Hindus and unnecessary appeasement of Muslims is not a good position, âSaamana’s editorial read.
The Shiv Sena reiterated its position that the religion of this country is Hinduism, but people of other religions can happily be part of this country. âAny Muslim ready to sacrifice himself for this country is Indian. It is nationalism and secularism. In Hindu culture, it is inappropriate when someone says âdon’t worry about inflationâ. Think of Ram Mandir and Mathura. We believe that today’s government at the Center does not merge with Hindu culture, âthe editorial said.
READ ALSO: Did the Congressional High Command Cut Navjot Singh Sidhu’s Wings?
âIn 1947, Hindustan was divided on the basis of religion. Muslims have their Pakistan. What is wrong if we believe that the remaining country was for the Hindus, âhe asked. He claimed that Hindus had always been placed in foster care. Jama Masjid Imam has been given more importance than Shankaracharya by the laity. âBecause of this, people revolted and Congress suffered the consequences. What Congress did in the case of Shah Bano cannot be forgotten, âhe added.
Congress had created an image of itself as a party appeasing Christians and Muslims, a Saamana editorial read. “It’s good that Rahul Gandhi has finally introduced this new school of thought [of Hindu rule]. We welcome that, âhe said.
Click here for IndiaToday.in’s full coverage of the coronavirus pandemic.